‘DAMNED IF YOU DO, AND DAMNED IF YOU DON’T’: COMMUNICATING ABOUT UNCERTAINTY AND EVOLVING SCIENCE DURING THE H1N1 INFLUENZA PANDEMIC
22 Users found this project useful

‘Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t’: communicating about uncertainty and evolving science during the H1N1 influenza pandemic

 

During the 2003 SARS outbreak in Toronto, Canada, communication with the public was poorly executed by health authorities. Key problems included mixed and unclear messages, widespread public confusion, and attributions of incompetence toward health officials. Subsequently, Canadian health officials developed pandemic plans that included specific sections dedicated to communication. Plans counseled a strategy of transparent risk messaging to give people the information they need and build public trust. When the H1N1 influenza pandemic arrived in Canada in 2009, these plans were put to their first test in a major public health event. However, many of the same problems that existed during SARS arose again during pH1N1. This study investigates the dissonances between the ideals and reality of communication during pH1N1 based on analyses of two data sources: (1) key informant interviews with senior health officials (n = 28) from federal and three provincial (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario) health jurisdictions in Canada; and (2) focus groups (n = 15) with general population Canadians (n = 140) in Alberta, Manitoba, and Ontario. Discussions with participants showed that even with a transparent communication approach, aspects of the pandemic, such as its ‘risk’ and the complexities of the immunization campaign, proved difficult to convey without causing public confusion. Members of the public often resorted to their own inventories of knowledge – usually those related to seasonal influenza – to interpret and make sense of pandemic messaging, but these did not guarantee accurate understandings. The inherent uncertainty of a real-time pandemic was also a difficult concept to communicate to a public with little prior experience of such an event. While transparent communication was intended to build trust, resulting confusion fueled a loss of confidence in health officials. A more ‘reasoned’ approach to transparency needs to inform future pandemic communication and further research is required to determine how to refine such an approach.

Keywords: Risk communication, transparency, Canada, infectious disease outbreak, immunization

GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT

Peace From Unilag

I cried not knowing how to go about my project but the day i searched online and saw iprojectmaster, i called and got my full project in less than 15minutes, i was shocked!


Oluchi From Michael Opara University

If you are a student and you have not used iprojectmaster materials, you are missing big time! iprojectmaster is the BEST


Uduak From Uniuyo

iProjectMaster is the best project site for students. Their works are unique and free of plagiarism!


Musa From Ahmadu Bello University

Thank you iprojectmaster for saving my life, please keep it up and may God continue to bless you people.


Samuel From Ajayi Crowther University

You guys just made life easier for students. Thanks alot iprojectmaster.com


Merry From BSU

I am now a graduate because of iprojectmaster.com, God Bless you guys for me.